As the perceived legitimacy of blockchain engineering increases, politicians in the United States take shown a growing interest in turning this not-partisan technology into a topic of political divisiveness.

Speaking via video to an audition of the Bloomberg New Economy Forum in Singapore on Friday, former presidential candidate Hillary Clinton said while cryptocurrencies were an "interesting" applied science, they likewise had the power to undermine the U.S. dollar and destabilize nations — "perhaps starting with pocket-size ones but going much larger." While no longer the leader of the Autonomous Party, Clinton's sentiment on crypto resembles that of top Democrat and senator Elizabeth Warren, who has oft criticized the crypto market place during committee hearings.

Clinton'due south comments came while discussing Russian President Vladimir Putin, whom she accused of beingness backside a disinformation and cyberwarfare entrada — seemingly also referring to ransomware attacks and some of the crypto payments associated with them. While the sometime presidential candidate's intentions are unknown, a prominent Democratic voice similar Clinton'south farther connecting Russian federation to a seemingly apolitical financial tool like crypto may have the potential to do harm among U.S. lawmakers trying to enact policy on both sides of the aisle.

Party politics in the United States are, at times, comically divisive. For example, many Republican voters destroyed their own property — Nike shoes and Keurig brewing machines, to proper noun a few — after lawmakers spoke out confronting old NFL quarterback Colin Kaepernick taking a knee during the U.S. national canticle. The entire discussion surrounding masks and vaccines in the U.S. is often framed not as a scientific matter, but i of "freedom," largely stoked by social media posts and statements from conservative mouthpieces.

Former President Pecker Clinton spoke at Ripple's Neat briefing in 2022, saying that the "permutations and possibilities" of blockchain were "staggeringly great," but he had been out of function for roughly 17 years when he made those statements. When a more electric current Democratic figure like Hillary Clinton speaks out against crypto, could information technology bear upon how the issue is handled by lawmakers in function now?

Related: Is Ethereum left and Bitcoin right?

On Monday, President Joe Biden signed a $ane trillion infrastructure bill into law that also implemented tighter rules on businesses handling cryptocurrencies and expanded the reporting requirements for brokers to include digital avails. While passing the beak through both chambers of Congress was achieved mostly along party lines — 69–30 votes in the Senate, 228–206 in the House — the linguistic communication on crypto was seemingly more of a bipartisan issue.

Cynthia Lummis is a Republican senator who has largely voted with her party on controversial issues, including against a commission to investigate the Jan. 6 attack at the U.Southward. Capitol and not to impeach the former president — however, fifty-fifty she is crossing the divide when it comes to crypto. Lummis voted against the infrastructure bill in the Senate and is currently working with Democratic Senator Ron Wyden to pass new legislation irresolute the police force'southward revenue enhancement reporting requirements so that they volition not apply to certain individuals.

Related: Bipartisan neb to report blockchain and crypto passes US Business firm of Representatives

Other efforts betwixt Democratic and Republican lawmakers suggest common basis for now — at to the lowest degree as far every bit crypto and blockchain are concerned. Texas' Democratic Party is planning to pilot a program aimed at raising money for candidates and causes using nonfungible tokens, while the National Republican Congressional Committee and many of the party's candidates for state and federal offices now have donations in cryptocurrency.